By Wlady Pleszczynski on 3.19.02 @ 12:36AM
Honesty and Kinsley. Whither Bill Maher? Chicago showdown.
SULTAN OF SWAT: Everyone feels sorry for
Michael Kinsley, who worried that would be everyone's reaction when
he announced he has Parkinson's. More recently it's been reported
he has found true love. As if to compensate on both fronts, Kinsley
seems determined to prove he's become neither nicer nor deserving
of anyone's sympathy. Why else would he open a
column with this: "If you're not careful, you can squander an
entire journalistic career swatting flies from the Wall Street
Journal editorial page" -- the same page that was once gracious
enough to allow him a weekly column, a fact the neocurmudgeon isn't
honest enough to tell readers about?
Or why else would Kinsley ridicule Virginia Thomas, wife of
Clarence Thomas, for the piece she did for the Journal defending
appeals court nominee Charles Pickering -- and then proceed to
attack Justice Thomas himself as someone who lied under oath and
who now "lies comatose in the Supreme Court"? But here too Kinsley
isn't honest enough to describe what was done to Thomas. He writes
that Thomas became a martyr in conservative eyes because Democrats
and liberals "accused him of being a right-wing ideologue with a
close mind about abortion rights, among other vicious lies," though
as everyone except David Brock and apparently Kinsley now knows,
those weren't ultimately the charges Thomas had to overcome. It was
only after it became clear that smearing Thomas as an Uncle Tom
Attila the Hun wouldn't defeat his nomination that the left dropped
the big one in an effort to destroy Thomas as a sexually harassing
pornographer. Again, Kinsley isn't honest enough to confront the
actual history of his own side's obsessive and never-ending
campaign to eradicate Thomas.
Normally, the notion "honest enough" isn't particularly useful
in debate, since it's so redolent of the sort of charge Kinsley
above all has been hurling at conservatives since time immemorial.
In his view, dishonesty is the one unforgivable sin and he's
forever finding it on the right. If only he were more vain and
spent more time staring into a mirror.
POLITICALLY INEPT: A Monday
link on Drudge informed us that Bill Maher's "Politically
Incorrect" show is apparently, finally,
at-long-last-though-not-that-anyone-knew-it-was-still-on going to
be dropped for good by the same folks at ABC who failed to oust Ted
Koppel or land Dave Letterman. The "Variety" critic who wrote the
linked-to story praises "Politically Incorrect" for various
mindless reasons, one of which stands out: the very late-starting
show attracted almost three million viewers a night even though no
one was ever sure when it was actually going to start.
Which pretty much summarized the show's appeal: it was a show
pretending to be a show, run and watched by perpetual adolescents
pretending to be sophisticated but no more convincing than kids who
put on their mother's lipstick, jewelry, and high heels or their
father's hat and double-breasted jacket.
His post-9/11 idiocies notwithstanding, Maher was essentially
harmless. If he was incapable of passing intelligence pre-9/11,
there was no reason to expect he would have known how to respond to
the requirements of gravity. Today he looks no older or maybe even
younger than he did in the comedic and even dramatic character
roles he played on TV and in movies a decade or two ago. He was
particularly good at playing the loser. Why didn't he keep his day
job?
NOT READY FOR PRIMARY TIME: Tuesday is primary day
in Illinois, and one race that's being watched is the Democratic
primary starring former Clinton aide Rahm Emanuel, who's in a close
race against Nancy Kaszak in the blue-collar 5th Congressional
District on Chicago's North Side. It's a perfect Democratic
matchup: a big shot Clintonite-turned-investment banker against a
union-backed local former state legislator who is both anti-NAFTA
and backed by EMILY's List and Gloria Steinem. According to the
Washington Post, when Emanuel accused Kaszak of being soft on
crime, she called the charge "sexist." Her EMILY's-funded ads
attacked Emanuel for his work in passing NAFTA and for brokering
mergers and acquisitions that earned him millions but costs
thousands of jobs. Will the big shot be brought down a peg or
two?
Kaszak didn't help herself when in her presence the president of
the Polish-American Congress, an unsavory fellow named Edward
Moskal, attacked Chicago-native Emanuel as a "millionaire
carpet-bagger," claimed he has dual Israeli citizenship (he
doesn't), and accused him of giving "his allegiance" to "certain
elements" that "defile the Polish homeland and continue to hurl
insults at the Polish people." Moskal should talk. In Polish his
last name means Muscovite.
topics:
Abortion, Movies, Supreme Court, Israel