By The Prowler on 2.20.02 @ 12:05AM
Was Zogby fair to Bush? Is Lott fair to Bush? Is Clinton fair to Gephardt?
FAIR MINDED
Some eyebrows went up last week when a Zogby poll indicated that
President Bush's public approval rating had dipped to under 74
percent. In fact, the same poll could also be read to indicate that
Bush's numbers remain above 90 percent. Not to be clintonesque, but
it all depends on the meaning of "fair."
The Zogby poll, conducted between January 31 and February 2,
asked 1,076 registered voters nationwide: "Overall, how would you
rate President Bush's performance on the job?" In response, 43.5
rated it "Excellent," 30.1 rated it "Good," and 19.2 percent rated
Bush "Fair. Only six percent rated Bush as "Poor."
"Zogby included that 19 percent on the poor side, which explains
the dip to 73 percent in job performance," says a Washington-based
Republican pollster. "Fair could mean many things and can be
interpreted many ways. It isn't a word many pollsters would want to
use in this kind of situation. I'd lump it with the good ratings,
but that's just me."
More telling, says the pollster, are the results from another
Zogby question in the same survey: "If after two years the war
against terrorism has been won but the economy is bordering on a
recession, would you judge President George W. Bush's performance
in office as excellent, good, fair or poor? The response: Excellent
23.4; Good 35.8; Fair 19.9; Poor 14.3; Not Sure 6.6."
Compared to the numbers in the first question, those in the
second, says the pollster, "are a little higher for 'Poor,' which
indicates to me that the voters understood 'Fair' to mean something
more positive than Zogby led the media to believe. If they didn't,
then with such a large sampling, I'd expect the Fair and Poor
numbers to be close in both questions. They aren't. Fair is fair.
And in this survey it is more than fair. It's good."
DICKIE COMES FIRST
Republican Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott has
angered the White House for refusing to get into the middle of some
family business. Lott's brother-in-law is trial lawyer par
excellence Dickie Scruggs, who organized many of
the state-backed class action lawsuits against tobacco companies,
and who is currently doing the same with HMO's.
The White House asked Lott for help in determining just how
far-reaching the lawsuits were going to be. Lott declined to go
along, believing the White House was pumping him for information
that would end up in the hands of HMO lobbyists in Washington
hoping for some inside information.
"It just wasn't going to be helpful to anyone," says a Lott
staffer about his boss's unwillingness to cooperate. "You know it
would have come out the White House was looking for inside
information and then leaking it. Heck, I'm telling you about it
now. They may be mad about it now, but they will thank us for it
later."
STILL HOUSE HUNTING
Former President Bill Clinton isn't interested in
helping many of the senators who stood by his side during
impeachment. Instead, he's thrown his lot in with the House -- as
part of his legacy project. "He's going to fundraise for Democrats
in the House big time," says a current Clinton aide. "He wants
credit for winning back the House for Democrats. That's his
plan."
Clinton has already agreed to "host" fundraisers in New York,
California, and Texas for the DNC. The events will be to raise the
visibility of current and possibly future House candidates. "All we
have to pay are his traveling expenses," says a seemingly relieved
DNC advance person. "We're getting him cheap."
When asked if such longtime Democratic warriors as Dick
Gephardt would be willing to cede credit to Clinton for
winning back the House, one Gephardt aide laughed: "We'll give
anyone credit as long as Mr. Gephardt is snatching that Speaker's
gavel out of Hastert's hands next January."
topics:
Bill Clinton, Business, Law, NATO