Karski: How One Man Tried to Stop the
Holocaust
By E. Thomas Wood and Stanislaw M. Jankowski
(John Wiley & Sons, 316 pages, $24.95)
Reviewed by Joshua Muravchik
In 1979, I entered graduate school at Georgetown University and signed up for a class, “The Government and Politics of Eastern Europe,” taught by a Professor Karski, of whom I had never heard. Aside from the fact that I didn’t know much about much, it turns out there was a good reason why I hadn’t heard of him. Jan Karski had published a best-selling book in 1944, Story of a Secret State, an account of his activities in the wartime Polish underground of which he was the leading emissary to the West. He had also brought to London and Washington perhaps the earliest authoritative, eyewitness accounts of Hitler’s holocaust of the Jews. Yet, so far as he could tell, these had no effect. As a result, when the war ended, he vowed to himself bitterly never to talk further of his wartime experiences, a vow kept for a quarter of a century. Thus, for those of us born too late to have known Karski’s book when it was in print, my ignorance of this man was far from unique.
By the time I took his class, Karski had abandoned his vow, agreeing to be interviewed for French filmmaker Claude Lanzmann’s epic documentary Shoah, of which Karski was widely seen as the hero, thus bringing him to the attention of younger generations. But the film was not released until some years later. In the meantime, I found a copy of Story of a Secret State on my parents’ bookshelves. Once I opened it, I could not put it down, and from it, rather than from anything he revealed in his lectures, I gathered the stature of this man.
Not that his lectures were impersonal. On the contrary, the students who had been in the department longer than I joked that the courses Karski taught were actually titled, “Karski 1, Karski 2, and Karski 3.” They were rich in anecdote, and often bore an imprecise relationship to the highly detailed syllabi he distributed the first day. But though he spoke of his experiences, he did so with a modesty that hid his importance from any student who did not learn details of his biography outside the classroom. He would point to his left side and say, “the Russians broke these ribs,” and then point to his right and say, “and the Nazis broke these ribs,” laughing a deep belly-laugh. But he gave us no inkling of what a major and costly operation was his rescue by the underground from the hands of the Gestapo.
KARSKI HAD BEEN commissioned an officer, and he may have been an aristocrat. Perhaps these explain his extraordinary carriage. Although already 65, he stood straighter than any other man I have ever seen. He was the apotheosis of Polish patriotism. Yet he had been forced to spend almost all of his adult life in exile. “I am a Yankee,” he would say, fully aware of how funny this sounded in his strong Polish accent, but intending the superficial humor also to reflect a deeper irony about the nature of his adopted country and the sad fate of his native land. Such sardonic humor infused his spellbinding lectures, and it seemed to me to be an outlet for the frustrations that history had dealt him.
Since the screening of Shoah in the early 1980s, Karski’s fame has spread among Jewish audiences. Although a plaque honoring him had long since been placed in Jerusalem, the government of Israel took the additional step of conferring honorary citizenship on him on the occasion of his eightieth birthday, last year. At the ceremony he declared: “Now, I, Jan Karski… a Pole, an American, a Catholic, have also become an Israelite! Gloria, Gloria in excelsis Deo” — a statement made with manifest emotion and solemnity, but also betraying a touch of that sardonic humor that I loved so in his lectures.
Karski’s following among Jews is richly deserved. In 1942, the Polish underground agreed to a request from the Jewish underground in Poland to convey information about the annihilation of Polish Jewry to the outside world. Karski, who was already assigned to carry a batch of secret messages to the Polish government in exile (in London), assumed this additional task. In order to fulfill this mission to the utmost, Karski arranged to be smuggled into the Warsaw ghetto for a detailed tour of its horrors. He did this not once, but twice. Then, at still greater risk, he was disguised as a local Ukrainian guard and insinuated into a Nazi death camp, so that he could bear witness first-hand to its workings.
The risk and pain were largely in vain. After a clandestine journey West, Karski brought word of the Holocaust to Anthony Eden, Franklin Roosevelt, and the leaders of world Jewry. The response of the governments was negligible (although Roosevelt did create the War Refugee Board). The response of Jewish leaders ranged from despair to disbelief. Szmul Zygielbojm, London representative of the Jewish Socialist Bund, committed suicide as an act of solidarity and protest. Justice Felix Frankfurter spent an evening with Karski hearing a private detailed account of his observations of the Holocaust and at the finish replied: “I am unable to believe you.” During the duration of the war, Karski insisted on pressing the issue of the fate of the Jews beyond the point that his Western listeners or Polish colleagues considered meet. These responses and non-responses helped to prompt Karski’s vow of silence.
IT WAS NOT ONLY Karski’s efforts to save the Jews that failed, but also to save Poland. Among the many messages he brought from the underground to the Polish leaders in London, one theme repeated itself: a Soviet-controlled alternative underground was being built by the Communists. Whatever it did to oppose the Nazis, this apparatus directed at least as much of its energies against the non- Communist underground and exile government. It even betrayed underground members to the Nazis. Once in London, Karski discovered that his reports of Communist perfidy evoked the anger of the Western allies — not toward Stalin but rather toward the non-Communist Poles for making an issue of it and thereby sounding a disharmonious note within the anti-Nazi alliance.
Soon Karski found himself in private audiences with British officials, including one with Foreign Minister Anthony Eden, in which the British broached the idea of revisions in Poland’s eastern boundaries in order to cede territory to the USSR. Karski soon grasped the bitter truth that the great democracies, which had felt compelled to go to war over Poland’s independence (after having indolently abetted the growing menace of Hitlerism), were now prepared to deliver Poland, at war’s end, bound and mutilated to Stalin.
Despairing of Britain’s cynical realism, the Polish leadership convinced itself that it would find salvation in Washington. Hence Karski was dispatched to the United States to rally support for Poland and to raise an alarm about Soviet aims. The American electorate contained a significant number of voters of Polish descent, to placate whom Roosevelt was prepared to make gestures and remarks that resembled support for Poland. But these were deliberately misleading. American politics was less influenced than British politics by cold realism but more influenced by sympathy for Stalin’s Russia. Washington was no less willing than London to sell Poland out.
Karski’s older brother, Marian, who had been like a father to him, and for whom Karski secured refuge in America, committed suicide in 1964. One reason, say Karski’s biographers, was that Marian “never reconciled himself to living in the United States, one of the countries that had, in his view, betrayed Poland to the Communists.”
THOSE BIOGRAPHERS, E. Thomas Wood and Stanislaw M. Jankowski, have produced a book, Karski: How One Man Tried to Stop the Holocaust, that is well researched, and unfailingly interesting. It is not, however, as mellifluous as Karski’s own Story of a Secret State, although it may be more reliable in some details since Karski’s book was written in 1944 under severe constraints, most of which arose from considerations of security but some also from politics.
The biography’s subtitle emphasizes Karski’s role in relation to the Holocaust. This is an understandable marketing strategy, as Karski is more famous among Jews than among most other Americans, and Jews are big book-buyers. But this was only one part of Karski’s story, and it would be a shame if that story does not find a wider American audience. (In Poland, as I have discovered in my contacts with Polish democrats over the past seven years, Karski’s name is well known.)
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Albert Constantine Jr.| 6.1.12 @ 8:41AM
I can think of few things so frustrating as bearing witness to great evil, and having those that you warn fail to believe, comprehend, or act appropriately.
Occam's Tool| 6.1.12 @ 10:27AM
Felix Frankfurter was a useless human being. A Liberal Attorney---there are few things more moronic to do with one's life.
He was a Paulbot's idea of a Perfect Jew.
One Mediator 1 Tim. 2:5. | 6.1.12 @ 11:55AM
Tell that to RCV, heh.
RCV| 6.3.12 @ 6:49PM
Love ya, too, Margie!
Stuart Koehl| 6.1.12 @ 12:05PM
The actual exchange was more along these lines:
Frankfurter: Mr. Karski, I cannot believe you.
Frankfurter's friend (who had escorted Karski): Felix, you can't call him a liar like that!
Frankfurter: Mr. Karski, I did not say you are lying. I said I am unable to believe you.
If you can understand this conversation, then you understand the uniqueness of the Holocaust and its place in human history.
Stuart Koehl| 6.1.12 @ 12:08PM
This is the Karski rendering of the story.
RCV| 6.3.12 @ 8:34PM
The full quote makes clear what Frankfurter is saying: I know you're telling the truth, but no human being can believe such a horror is real.
Occam's Tool| 6.1.12 @ 3:41PM
Yes. Thus showing the lack of imagination and misunderstanding of the possibilities of evil that should have DQ'ed him from the Supreme Court Bench. Or, in other words, when he had a chance at the plate, one of the most powerful Jewish attorneys of the 20th Century struck out in the biggest at bat of his life. (I like scrambled eggs and metaphors)
Meanwhile, a much more useful Jew, Hank Greenberg, was at a battlefront, having volunteered.
I really cannot convey to you my dislike of Frankfurter sufficiently.
RCV| 6.3.12 @ 6:43PM
Ironically, Occam, though he served as a judicial advisor to FDR, in his later years on the bench, he became a judicial conservative and firm advocate of judicial restraint in he face of the Warren court's activism.
RCV| 6.3.12 @ 8:45PM
To follow up, Occam, the conservative legal voice, Phillip Kurland, penned a tribute to Franfurter's legacy of judicial conservatism, called I believe, "Mr. Justice Frankfurter and the Constitution". Frankfurter was a rare breed: a political liberal who understood the proper limited nature of the judiciary in a constitutional republic. He's on most lists of the best Supreme Court justices in history, especially lists by conservatives.
Occam's Tool| 6.1.12 @ 10:28AM
Karski is a Mensch.
Stuart Koehl| 6.1.12 @ 12:07PM
Even from beyond the grave.
RCV| 6.3.12 @ 6:43PM
Amen to that.
Stuart Koehl| 6.1.12 @ 12:07PM
Josh was at GU shortly after me, but his experience of Karski, as teacher and as man, was exactly the same as mine. And everybody called his classes "Karski 1, Karski 2 and Karski 3".
Of all my professors at GU, only three had lasting influence on me: Karski, Jeanne Kirkpatrick, and Edward Luttwak. Only Luttwak remains, but he is still a great mentor.
nathan| 6.1.12 @ 12:09PM
Regarding Karski's meetings with both Eden and FDR he probably wasn't telling them their intelligence services hadn't already told them. There were recon photos taken of Auschwitz which clearly showed Birkenau noting the gas chambers and other parts of the complex. Jewish groups asked that Birkenau be bombed and destroyed and they were told that Eighth Airforce planes could not make the round trip without stopping in Russia. That was true but Ninth Airforce planes in Italy could make the trip and were not offered.
We read constantly about "selling Poland out" to the communists, to Russia. Was that really true? Did the Americans and British have any real options here? Max Hastings history of WWII should be required reading. Russia suffered the overwhelming percentage of the deaths in Europe, something like 80 percent of loss of life in that theatre of war. But also, they did almost all the heavy lifting. We glorify D-Day and the march through France but in reality Russia was responsible again for what about 80 percent of the Germans killed. Given those numbers, were they really going to just listen to anything the Americans and British had to say regarding Poland, Hungary or the rest of eastern Europe. By their calculations they had earned the right to do bloody well what they pleased in the countries they had over run and to a fair extent they had a point. Did America "sell Poland out" or simply recognized the reality as it was?
Cpm| 6.1.12 @ 2:36PM
Exactly. What were we supposed to do to make those 550 Red Army divisions go away?
Occam's Tool| 6.1.12 @ 3:43PM
Hi, Nathan! In August of 1945 we had what Mr. Tomato, one of Rocky Marciano's backers, would have called an equalizer.
Do I, uh, need to explain da concept of an equalizer to ya?
Cobalt| 6.1.12 @ 6:48PM
The United States should have done more to accept Jewish immigrants in the late 1930s, before the Holocaust.
You can blame FDR, or say he did what he could, under the circumstances. Same thing goes for the State Department. We just should have done more.
SS St. Louis
Mistral| 6.2.12 @ 2:44AM
This concern is fine providing we do not forget that the SWW was about wider issues than the genocide of one ethnic/culture group. The Chinese and Russians lost more poeple than any other nations through this insane war. Note too that in Poland half the losses in Nazi death camps were Catholics including thousands of priests.
Lest we forget!
Cobalt| 6.2.12 @ 11:21AM
The Soviets had a lot of Polish blood on their hands, as well..
Katyn Massacre
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre
Cobalt| 6.2.12 @ 11:26AM
Daniel Craig's 2008 film "Defiance" might be worth renting, for some people anyway.
RCV| 6.3.12 @ 6:45PM
There's good reason the Poles detest the Russians, and the legacy of the Katyn massacre will live for generations.
GoldMorgCom | 6.12.12 @ 6:33PM
My father whitnessed that the camps and incinerators were a public secret and with specific weather conditions the smell of burned human flesh traveled all the way to the Netherlands.
Also the resistance in the Netherlands was deliberately withheld any substantial support.