The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Feature

The Reagan Doctrine

You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.

(From the March, 1985 issue of The American Spectator.)

Nuclear weapons kill people. They should be limited and, ideally, completely dismantled. Satellites and other systems that defend people against those weapons should not be limited. Indeed, they should be encouraged: It will be easier to limit offensive arms if such defenses are allowed.

This, in a nutshell, is the U.S. arms control position that emerged from the furious parlaying at and around Geneva. In the face of Soviet attempts to use negotiations to kill our “Star Wars” defense program, Ronald Reagan and his spokesmen — Caspar Weinberger, Robert McFarlane, George Shultz, and Kenneth Adelman — made it clear before, during, and after the talks that Star Wars is no mere bargaining chip. Rather, strategic defenses are the foundation of a whole new structure for arms control talks between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.

This new Reagan Doctrine was conveyed time and again in the weeks surrounding Geneva. In a major speech on Star Wars before Christmas, Caspar Weinberger stated emphatically that Star Wars will not be traded away. He also gave several reasons why the American left and the Soviets should welcome a gradual build-up of defenses and a gradual build-down of offenses as a step toward disarmament. Asked about Weinberger’s speech, Reagan reiterated that he does not intend to trade Star Wars away. Pressed by reporters to explain if this would eliminate any “linkage” at Geneva, Reagan publicly announced his instruction to Shultz that he should inform the Russians we will not trade away Star Wars to get an agreement on offensive arms. Rather, he said, we will talk about limiting or eliminating almost any offensive system, but only under an umbrella of defensive protection. Shultz effectively did this in refusing Gromyko’s demand that the U.S. freeze its Star Wars program while talks on offensive weapons continue.

All the signs that this was the official U.S. position were somehow missed in what must have been a million words of sometimes perceptive, often inane commentary by Western journalists. The press insisted on jumping for joy when the U.S. and Soviets agreed to talk about space weapons. Some even praised Reagan for cleverly using Star Wars as a ploy to get the Soviets back to the table. Yet at a press conference the evening after the talks closed, President Reagan emphasized, as he had for Margaret Thatcher just before Geneva, that our aim at the talks would be to explain that the encouragement of defenses will promote progress on eliminating nuclear weapons, not hinder it.

Ironically, by treating the mere opening of talks on Star Wars as a major victory for arms control, the press unwittingly implied that the legitimacy of such weapons is no longer in doubt. Where does that leave the 1972 treaty on anti-ballistic missiles, which outlawed strategic defenses? As Morton Kondracke astutely pointed out, the real meaning of Geneva is that the ABM treaty, in effect, will have to be renegotiated. This will have no bearing on whether Star Wars will proceed, but rather on the larger issue of whether the limits on defenses established twelve years ago will ever apply again. How could so many commentators and pundits miss such a radical change of arms control course? Part of the answer lies in simple fatuity. Television and even newspaper journalists were so busy reading entrails — Did the inflection in Shultz’s voice change from the first meeting? Was Gromyko smiling, or didn’t he like the shrimp cocktail? — that they had no time to listen to what Reagan and his deputies were saying.

What is fortunately beginning to sink in is that Star Wars is not some hopeless boondoggle. If it were, we would not be seeing such a panicky determination on the part of the Soviets to kill it. Indeed, the Soviet Union’s frenzied effort to stop Star Wars has convinced many conventional wisdomers — Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Charles Krauthammer — that it may be useful in providing the Soviets with a great incentive to bargain, constituting a “chip” in the old arms control sense.

But the bargaining chip argument ends the moment the chip is traded away. And if Star Wars really is so effective, why squander it? This is the essence of the Reagan Doctrine, which sees that defenses are one thing that should not be traded for “progress” on other fronts. Rather, both sides should vigorously pursue Star Wars and other related ideas because the protection of defense-oriented systems will make it easier to negotiate both arms control and, ultimately, disarmament.

THIS PROPOSITION SOUNDS radical only to those mesmerized by the countervailing logic of Mutual Assured Destruction, on which the ABM treaty was based. The idea of “defense protected build-down” was in fact first stated by the Soviet Union. In a long-since forgotten speech to the U.N. General Assembly in 1962, Andrei Gromyko set forth the case for what is now the Reagan Doctrine:

Policy-making officials in the United States, the United Kingdom, and other Western countries can be heard saying that the best guarantee against a new war is the “balance of fear.” Means of destruction and annihilation have become so powerful, argue the proponents of this view, that no state will run the risk of starting a nuclear war since it will inevitably sustain a retaliatory nuclear blow … . But to base the policy of states on a feeling of universal fear would be tantamount to keeping the world in a permanent state of feverish tension and eve-of-war hysteria.

Instead, Gromyko and the Soviets argued for a swift program of nuclear disarmament. In case the West should suspect the Soviets of cheating on such an agreement, Gromyko proposed that both sides be allowed to build defenses against nuclear weapons, providing “a cover” against such trickery. Now, in 1962, the Soviets had rather more to gain than the U.S. from nuclear disarmament. The U.S. enjoyed a substantial strategic advantage, as the Soviets would soon learn during the Cuban missile crisis. We relied on nuclear weapons to back up the conventional defense of Europe. Nevertheless, John F. Kennedy was intrigued by Gromyko’s draft disarmament treaty, and rightly so. Kennedy was also receiving reports on a “Star Wars” program of his own — Project Defender, a proposed space-based defense against Soviet missiles under study since the Eisenhower Administration. Kennedy saw that Gromyko’s disarmament offer when combined with a Project Defender program might enable his administration to free the world from the nuclear threat, at the cost only of a slightly larger budget for the United States and Europe.

But JFK’s interest in strategic defense, and the Gromyko treaty, never had a chance to come to fruition. First the Cuban missile crisis, and then Lee Harvey Oswald, deferred any serious discussion of these ideas. In the aftermath of JFK’s death, Robert McNamara emerged as the chief creator of strategic doctrine in the Johnson Administration. And McNamara was seized by the logic of Mutual Assured Destruction, believing that in a few years, when the Soviets achieved offensive parity, the futility of MAD would make disarmament inevitable.

The Soviets, for their part, went along reluctantly. By the late 1960s, however, they became aware of how the MAD strategy was eroding America’s will. Suddenly, it seemed possible that the Americans really would not pursue strategic defense. It was even possible for the Soviets to envision and plan for a first strike of their own. With the signing of the ABM treaty in 1972, the Soviets codified the MAD doctrine that has made their buildup of nuclear weapons so effective.

The Reagan Doctrine enjoys even better technologies for defense than President Kennedy had in 1962. But it is based on principles similar to those outlined by Gromyko at the U.N.

In the first place, strategic defenses constitute a kind of “automatic arms control,” as Reagan science adviser George Keyworth put it. An 80-percent effective defense constitutes a reduction of an opponent’s destructive capacity just as surely as an arms control treaty requiring an opponent to dismantle 80 percent of his force. Of course, that still leaves each side with thousands of warheads. But then, so did the Salt II treaty. According to MAD proponents, defenses must be “perfect” to have any utility, whereas pieces of paper need only represent a “first step” in the right direction. The Reagan Doctrine, as expounded by Keyworth and Weinberger, simply undoes that old double standard, and says that defenses should he evaluated on the same scale as treaties: In other words, are they moving us in the right direction?

Page: 1 2 3   Last ›

topics:
Flashback

Letter to the Editor View all comments (25) |

Jack in Wi.| 5.4.12 @ 6:31AM

Well Reagan met with Gorbachov and signed a huge nuclear arms control treaty, that reduced the world's nuclear arms. The Neoconservatives fought him every step of the way. For them the Cold War would never end. These same lunatics want us to spend vast amounts of American money, defending Europe from the missiles of the ghosts of Hitler, and Stalin, and a non existent Iranian atomic weapons program. All these countries don't need this phantom defense which is only agravating both Russia and China. The only nuclear power with a program to blow up much of the world is Israel with it's Samson Option. That is the country which should be surrounded with an Star Wars program to stop them from blowing up the world.

The heads of the Israeli military and intelligence communities have spoken up against the warmongering of the present government of Binny Netanyahu and his defense minister Barak. Among them is the current headof the military General Ganz. The current head of the Mossad who has said that Iran is a rational player and is not an essential threst to Israel at this time. Others who have spoken up are General Ashkanazi, former military chief, former Shin Bet head Yuval Diskin, and former heads of the Mossad Meir Dagan, and Effriam Halevey. I wish we had such brave officers in this country, who could have stopped the disaster in Iraq from happening.

The Truth| 5.4.12 @ 7:42AM

"Springtime for Hitler and Germany"
-The Producers(movie)-1968

And now ladies and gentleman, fresh from the pages at Stormfront as the real life "Franz Liebkind(Ken Mars)"
I bring you, Jack(Hasbarats "R" them) from Wi.!!!!

Jack in Wi.| 9.10.11 @ 10:04AM
"Whatever good INDIVIDUAL Jews have done in the world pails in comparission to the bad of the last 200 years. Atheism, communism, Socialism, Nuclear Weapons, expansionist Zionism, nuclear blackmail and abortion"
---------
Jack in Wi| 11.3.11 @ 4:28PM
"I have never writen any anti-semitic coments on this site"

Jack in Wi. 4-26-12
"And they think we should be cry forever about the SO CALLED holocaust"

"At least Obama hates Netanyahu"

"It's alright to hate evil and the devil. Netanyahu is the devil incarnate. He is Hitler on steroids"

"Hitler didn't own most of the American political class, like Netanyahu does. That makes him as bad as Hitler probably worse anyday"

"Hitler never called out so blatanly for the mass murder of millions like is done everyday on this site. He had at least the DECENCY to not do that"(what a swell guy)

"I don't demonize any race"

Jack in Wi.| 5.1.12 @ 8:06AM
"It is time to make PEACE not war"
"Those who live by the sword will die by the sword"(can we say hypocrite?)
------
"We need a second WAR of independence'

"Hitler didn't have 500 atomic weapons and plans to use them"
(Huh? Ok, The Romans didn't have AK47's and a plan to use them!)

"He(Hitler) at least pretended to be for peace most of the time before the war"

"Hitler had the best poison nerve gas in the world, in large supplies, and DIDN"T use it" (Holocaust victims might disagree here)

"Wall and the Federal Reserve and their disastrous policies have been headed by Jewish people in many instances. hollywood and the media which pushed pro war propaganda prior to WW2 was and is headed in large by Jewish people."(they are everywhere folks, behind every tree, bush, or fence)

"Then there are the five Mossad agents dancing and high fiving on the Jersey shore as the World Trade Center collapsed. I have to believe that story.(it was those damn Jews again, can we say 9-11 truther?)

And from the FAILED prophet corner, some comic relief:

Jack in Wi.| 8.23.11 @ 6:38PM

"You are not kicking us out of the movement we are kicking you out. Your day is done"

"Ron Paul will be our next Presdient. He will get 60% of the vote"

"I went to the innaguarations of both Reagan and Bush. I just bought an new tuxedo for the upcoming one for Ron Paul That is how confident I am."

For our brave Seal teams and special forces:

Jack in Wi.| 5.2.12 @ 7:12AM
I would have offered the Seals a huge reward to the one who took Bin Laden alive, if it was possible. They love to torture people for information.

And Remember:

Jack in Wisc.
"I know more than everybody here including the editors"
(Can we say Hubris?)

And that is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth!
May God so help you.

Clint| 5.4.12 @ 10:23AM

The Truth,
Israel Firster Smear Bund Propaganda BibiBot.

" Ex-Israeli officials criticize Netanyahu’s bellicose stance on Iran

TEHRAN - The former head of Israel’s Shin Bet security agency has criticized Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak for adopting a bellicose stance on Iran, according to the Haaretz daily.

Yuval Diskin, who was speaking at a public meeting in Beit-ul-Moqaddas (Jerusalem) on Friday, said Israel’s political leaders are exaggerating the effectiveness of a possible military attack on Iran, AP reported.

“I don’t have faith in the current leadership of Israel…,” he stated.

“I do not believe in a leadership that makes decisions based on Messianic feelings,” Diskin added.

Former Mossad chief Meir Dagan backed Diskin on Sunday, saying that he disagrees with Netanyahu’s policy on solving Iran’s issue, according to Haaretz.

He also called a strike against Iran’s nuclear program “stupid”, AP reported.

Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said at a conference hosted by the Jerusalem Post in New York on Sunday that he is against an attack on Iran, criticizing Netanyahu’s policy on Iran, Bloomberg reported.

In addition, Israel’s military chief Lieutenant General Benny Gantz, in an interview with Haaretz published on April 25, said that he does not believe Iran will decide to develop nuclear weapons, describing the country’s leadership as “very rational”.

“I think the Iranian leadership is comprised of very rational people,” Gantz stated."

Jack in Wi.| 5.4.12 @ 7:09PM

I have probably written a 100,000 words on this site and this bird cherry picks a few quotes out of context. I am glad the boys in Hafia, at Hasbaret headquarters, are upset with me. It shows that I am doing my job, of bringing truth to the ignorant.

By the way I read this article back in 1985. Clint keep up the good work. The story of the fact that there are many in Israel who want no more wars has to be gotten out in this country.

Clint| 5.4.12 @ 11:25PM

Jack, The Israel Firsters Smear Bund Goebbels Propaganda Agendist BibiBots Play The Dog Eared Anti-Semite Card On Anyone,Who Dares To Not Ass Kiss Their Israel Firster Agenda.

They Think That They Are Gonna Use Fiscal Conservatives & Religious Conservatives As Their "Useful Dupes" Again And Serve Us More Of Their Arlen Specter-John McCain"Lesser Evil" Democrap Lite Faux Conservative Crap Sandwiches.

There's A Rebellion Goin' On Out Here.

We Focus On Winning The Senate & House And Oppose The Israel Firster RINO-CINO Romney McCain Redux Sell Out Of Conservatism.

Hasbaret HQ in Hafia| 5.6.12 @ 9:22AM

Dear Jack and Clint,

We Zionist Jews at Hasbaret HQ would like to personally like to thank you and Clint for your steller work in assuring that the possible election of Ron Paul would never occur.

The tireless efforts you both have put forth by illustrating the type and caliber of lunatics that follow Mr. Paul's coat tails virtually assured that any sane person would vote for somebody else, in fact ANYBODY else than Ron Paul.

We now have our man, Mitt Romney in the drivers seat as we have planned which as you know fits well into our plan for world domination and control of the human race.

A special thanks goes out to Clint, who, taking time out from his busy and hectic life of importance somewhere, religiously posted his unrelenting drivel 7 days a week, 12 months a year until it reviled anybody who may have been Ron Paul oriented heading to the voting booth. Thanks Clint for wasting hours and days of your life you'll never get back from your time here on earth. Your supreme sacrifice on our behalf will never be forgotten.

signed,

The boys at Hasbaret HQ, Eli, Mordecai, Elezar and Samual.

Jack in Wi.| 5.6.12 @ 2:37PM

Come on: You boys would have assassinated Ron if he came near the Presidency. You let the media, you control, do your assassinating for you. Ron has lit a fire that is just getting started. We are taking this country back and are bringing our troops home. Do your own fighting and dying. Pay for it with your own money. I am glad a lot of sane military and intelligence people in Israel and here are speaking out against an Iran war. It gives me a little hope for the future.

Alan Brooks| 5.4.12 @ 12:27PM

Jack, their demonizing you as an anti-semite wont cut it anymore: their hatred for Islam is showing.
What they mean is that Arabs and Shiites have no industrial leverage, so we can just think of their region as an oil spigot.

Alan Brooks| 5.4.12 @ 12:33PM

Listen, you Repuglicans:
first you win in Ashcanistan, THEN we can discuss the Mideast.
And btw, no wonder you like Reagan so much; the '80s was the last era you did things right-- today your GOP gastank is filled with Reagan-fumes.

TLP| 5.4.12 @ 7:11AM

We all need to REMEMBER who these people are.

They're Joe Kennedy Sr. and Walter Duranty. They liked Hitler, and LOVED Stalin. They're Hollywood, and Madison Avenue, putting out their Leftist Propaganda on "The SIN of being a Patriot".

They are the people who have sought to Undermine our Armed Forces' ability to keep us safe, for 60 Years. They're the ones who DEMANDED that South Vietnam fight their own War, and then Stabbed them in the Back, by refusing them the Weapons that they needed, and that they had been PROMISED.

They marched in Europe over the placement of Short Range Nuclear Missiles in West Germany, to COUNTER the ones that the Communist Warsaw Pact, already had in place and pointed at Western Europe.

They marched for Unilateral Disarmament. They marched over here, and they marched over there. One of them, a young William Jefferson Blythe Clinton - the lying, RAPIST, son of a Hot Springs Whore, and a future Impeached President, actually Marched in the Capitol City (MOSCOW) of our greatest Enemy.

They fought AGAINST very new Weapons System. They fought the rebuilding of our Navy. They fought the upgrading of our Nuclear Stockpiles. They fought the B-1 Bomober, the Abrams Tank, and every form of Missile Defence.

They've even gone to the lengths of committing TREASON, with Jane Fonda going over to the Enemy Camp to give Aid and Comfort to the North Vietnamese troops who were killing OUR TROOPS. There was the release of the Pentagon Papers. And, there was the son of the Hitler Lover - TED KENNEDY - offering his ADVICE to the leader of the SOVIET UNION, on how to defeat OUR PRESIDENT- Ronald Reagan-in their upcoming Negotiations.

They Marched in the streets against The War in Vietnam. They attacked the Honour of our Troops, calling them "Baby Killer" and Spitting on them, when they come home.

They're the SCUM that Marched in the Streets in the Sixties. They're the Black Panthers, the Weather Underground, the Symbian Liberation Army, and the Chicago 7.

It's over 50 Years later, and they are STILL at it.

They are still Blaming America 1st. They are still doing everything to UNDERMINE OUR TROOPS in Wartime. They still have Compassion for our Enemies, and COMTEMPT for the rest of us.

The Politicians, the News Media, the Hollywood Elites. They still Fight this Country, like a Spoiled Rich Kid, who rebels against his parents, who have always given him everything he could have ever wanted. It's a miracle that we've made it this far.

Today? I don't know. But I get the feeling that others have felt the way I do, now.

Egyptians, Persians, Rome, and the people of Great Britain, when it hit them that, this is the beginning of the End. That, the Greatness that they had known, for so long, was about to be passed on to someone else.

Think about it.

The country that put a Man ON THE MOON, now requires a "Ride" from the Land of Drunks, if it wants to Break the Surly Bonds, these days.

God help my Children, and their Children.

Mike 3/505| 5.4.12 @ 8:03AM

...and the Mighty Ronaldus Magnus proved them all wrong and ran the Soviet Union off of the battlefield. Our current president is in the process of attempting to cede the battlefield back to them.

Bob K.| 5.4.12 @ 10:59AM

You forgot old Joe Kennedy's kid bailing out of the Bay of Pigs!

Alan Brooks| 5.5.12 @ 10:47PM

"Joe Kennedy Sr"

Pat Buchanan is Old Joe with a bit more charm.

Bob K.| 5.4.12 @ 10:52AM

It is a bit ironic that the Star Wars program was named after President Reagan's favorite movie and the name was accepted enthusiastically by the entire press, including the conservative press.

Bob K.| 5.4.12 @ 10:55AM

I haven't watched the movie in a long time but I recall seeing it when it came out and enjoying it greatly. I don't recall anything in it about defense though.

TrueBlue | 5.4.12 @ 1:25PM

Fighting for the Republic.

FeFe| 5.4.12 @ 1:54PM

Yes, but how does this help Ron Paul get delegates for the convention so he may activate the conspiracy?

Clint| 5.4.12 @ 3:47PM

Call Bibi.

Ronald Reagan,
"Ron Paul is one of the outstanding leaders fighting for a stronger national defense. As a former Air Force officer, he knows well the needs of our armed forces, and he always puts them first. We need to keep him fighting for our country."

POST American| 5.4.12 @ 10:51PM

ALMOST as sad as having to realize
Nixon became the Rockefeller CFR's
'Nick's ON' viz a viz the MAO handover

---is realizing Reagan, streak of genuineess
notwithstanding, was a compromised figure
who stood as an EYE --CON for the deluded
during the very height of the RED China
handover, and presided merrily over the
franchise slumming of the landscape and
the wampum saturation of the marketplace.

There's NO getting around it.

----Though we have to admit, the deadly,
Milner Group sourced, Rockefeller-rotten
CFR has been calling the shots in this country
for over a century ----still, there seems to remain
some substance to Goldwater, and, even a bit in
Eisenhower.

But for the REAL deal --one simply MUST go
back to the Calvinist baptised, Illuminati
spurning, LATE, Great Washington.

"John Calvin was America's REAL founding father."
-George Bancroft
(America's first historian emeritus)
1832

----HE was there!

Porch 'MAY--SINs' and even 'A'--theists
would do well to download the three Johns
some time
---------------John Calvin
--------------------------Bunyan
------------------------------an Gill.

Couple this with the latest disclosures
of the capstone EUGENICS and world
takedown op ----and YOU ARE THERE!

---ACCEPT NO TAVISTOCK SUBSTITUTES!---

Zbigniew Mazurak | 5.5.12 @ 6:32AM

While the auhor of this article, like Ronald Reagan himself, was well-intentioned, they were also both dead wrong. Missile defense can NEVER replace America's nuclear deterrent. It can only complement it and protect the US against limited BM attacks by rogue states and terrorists.

POST American| 5.5.12 @ 7:09AM

--AGAIN!--

The 2 days ago ALEX JONES interview
with Joel Skousen is WELL WORTH
CHECKING OUT.

Informed speculation on Globalist ploy to
get a third world war going via North Korean
attack on South Korea --and RED China
stepping in and bringing on a nuclear
exchange with the States.

Notes the Pentagon is oddly blindsiding
its intel on the status of BOTH the RED
Chinese and Russian militarization threats.

ALL this as Hollywood and media continue
to BURY without a trace not only ANY
serious examination, or even reference
to the RED Chinese Halocaust ---BUT!
the 60th Anniversary of the uncannily
relevant --------KOREAN WAR-------------.

Doesn't even issue a single regular yearly
assessment of the Russ ---and only one
on Globalist M--powered RED China.

"KOREA, and NOT the long gone world
wars, is rapidly emerging as the definitive
conflict of the 20th century viz a viz
the Globalism and EUGENICS takedown
of the 21st."

---Globalism --U.N. deployment ---mind control
---Globalist betrayal ---RED China Halocaust
warm up ---Genocide ---------EUGENICS
---the ultimate Orwellian nightmare come
TRUE etc. etc. etc.

-------------------------------NORTH KOREA!

The unfolding Globalist world state----------!

Little Korea, like Tibet, like Taiwan,
----and even Japan, to be thrown under the bus.

Of course, like our 2 earlier world wars,
this will, in the long run, simply be used
to bring FINAL capitulation to Globalist
'Rule by X--spurts' takeover --and
FINAL EUGENICS ----takedown.

ALSO ----

that JAY WEIDNER interview
on RED Ice Radio
'Clash of Civilizations' pt. 2
(yahoo videos)
laying out the capstone links to ISLAM,
and ISLAM being deployed as a much
needed religious component for NWO
rollout ---is riveting and bears repeat listening.

FURTHER:

RED Ice Radio interview with
Joseph P. Farrell is genuinely
thought provoking in its unflinching
examination of the deep links between
'authorized' pyhsics and capstone USURY.
SEE: 'BABYLON'S Banksters'
RED Ice Radio
(yahoo videos)

--------------------ESSENTIAL LISTENING----------

This IS the 11th hour-----. . .

Alan Brooks| 5.5.12 @ 10:48PM

You'll be saying it's the 11th hour the rest of your life.

TeaPartyPatriot4ever| 5.5.12 @ 8:55PM

Excellent article and accurately true in conception, theory, perception, reality, and fact.

So to look at the overall context of what President Reagan had to deal with is amazing how much he accomplished as US President.

Of course today, with Obama as President, the opposite is happening, as Obama intentionally gives away America's defenses to the Russians and Chinese, along with his direct downsizing, gutting, and hollowing out of the US Military, via Defense Budget, stopping and or delaying new technology from being implemented, stopping the upgrades and new inventory resupply of Military hardware of ships, planes, etc, along with his intentional proposal to remove 80% of America's nuclear arsenal and their delivery systems, as Obama sees America has the evil empire, and not the socialist-marxist communists.

Caroline Glick from her article "America’s Descent into Strategic Dementia"- Mar 21st 2011

quote-

"Since taking office, Obama has made clear that he views the US as an imperialist power on the world stage. As a result, the overarching goal of Obama’s foreign policy has been to end US global hegemony.

Obama looks to the UN as a vehicle for tethering the US superpower. He views US allies in the Middle East and around the world with suspicion because he feels that as US allies, they are complicit with US imperialism." -unquote

Headline Quote-

"Obama Mulls 80 Percent Disarmament of Nuclear Arsenal"
Tuesday, 14 Feb 2012 03:06 PM- NewsMax.com
-

Thus is the madness of such a national leader, for which the people elected.. Thus the madness extends to the voting electorate that elects someone who is determined and bent on the destruction of their own country.

And the so is the truth about Obama's agenda of and accomplishment of America's internal intentional destruction in and of every area of the Nation from the Economy, to Energy, to National Defense, etc, etc.

If one were to say how can we have let this happen, I would only say this- Complacency, Ignorance, and Indifference, breeds Apathy and Stupidity, then Disaster.

The left is a cancerous toxic ideology, and can and will completely destroy a civilized society of Freedom, Liberty, Democracy, and the Truth, in a blink of an eye. Thus is the left, aka liberals, whole premise of being, the tearing down and destroying of everything good in this world just to make their statist utopian paradise of misery, poverty, and societal blithe a reality, just to make themselves ideologically politically happy.. Compared to the Conservative premise of being, aka the opposite of liberals, to build up everything that is good in this world, the US Constitution, Individual Freedom and Liberty and sovereignty, and "We the People" as the supreme power and authority in this Nation, not the govt..

Quote-

"Let us be sure that those who come after will say… we did everything that could be done."

You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we will sentence them to take the first step into a thousand years of darkness. If we fail, at least let our children and our children's children say of us we justified our brief moment here. We did all that could be done."

Freedom ... must be fought for, protected, and handed on for [our children] to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children, what it was once like where men were free.  

There can be no real peace while one American is dying some place in the world for the rest of us. We're at war with the most dangerous enemy that has ever faced mankind ... and ... if we lose that war, and in so doing lose this way of freedom of ours, history will record ... that those who had the most to lose did the least to prevent its happening."

~President Ronald Wilson Reagan~

Clint| 5.6.12 @ 9:38AM

Ronald Reagan,
" Perhaps we didn't appreciate fully enough the depth of the hatred and the complexity of the problems that made the Middle East such a jungle. Perhaps the idea of a suicide car bomber committing mass murder to gain instant entry to Paradise was so foreign to our own values and consciousness that it did not create in us the concern for the marines' safety that it should have.

In the weeks immediately after the bombing, I believed the last thing that we should do was turn tail and leave. Yet the irrationality of Middle Eastern politics forced us to rethink our policy there. If there would be some rethinking of policy before our men die, we would be a lot better off. If that policy had changed towards more of a neutral position and neutrality, those 241 marines would be alive today."

POST American| 5.6.12 @ 11:49PM

-----AS 'RE-education CAMP' documents
are now leaking across the web.

PNAC documents from Dick 'CHAIN--knee'
back in 2000---LONG PUBLIC.

Subsequent reams of documents implementing
RE---EDUCATION internment camps
---weaponized 'la Bottom ---ME' shots
and PSY OPS ----ALLLLLL laid out for
ALLLLL to see.

Yet still, the addicts of rectum worship
REFUSE to rise from their '90's Show'
CON-----ops 'CON--dish--inning.'

"In the camps throughout the war,
until the very end, you'd hear the
murmurs ---'WHY did we do NOTHING
when we could have? ----WHY???????' "
-Auchwitz 'Survivor'

SO, YOU THERE! ---put aside the playoffs,
and porn, and 'Simpson's' programming, and
Tavistock engineered, triggered responses.

YOUR government has been USURPED.

------------The Republic has FALLEN--------------

--------------OCCUPATION is HERE!-----------------

----Once you've dropped your feeble,
'authorized' OUCH WITs ---get ready and
turn around.

-------TAKE A GOOD LONG DEEP LOOK at
manner, nature and 'plans' of capstone
USURY, the 'hidden masters' thereof,
----and their primordial 'fave' op-----
-------------FINAL EUGENICS------------.

NOW unfolding ---WORLDWIDE. . .

Related Articles

More Articles by Gregory A. Fossedal

More Articles From Feature

http://spectator.org/archives/1985/03/01/the-reagan-doctrine

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

USPS: Radical Surgery Needed

Peter Hannaford | 5.17.13

ADVERTISEMENT